Majority of testimony was on this single part and most were opposed.

While the agenda listed just two items PIA 4(2) and PIA 3(2) most would agree the were up to twelve portions on which to testify. SEE:

A few of the eight testifiers touched on a few items in the package but the majority simply addressed the single one, noted as # 10 in both items, “regional district boundary amendments,” and all but one, the RAM paid lobbyist, voiced objections.

As is often the case, we were unable to be present for the entire meeting this morning (9/6/16), so we are not yet aware of any outcome. Stay Tuned


IMG_4276 IMG_4280 IMG_4283 IMG_4284 IMG_4286 IMG_4288